Rasile v. State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rasile v. State Division of Human Rights

50 A.D.2d 875, 377 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11761

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 875 (Rasile v. State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rasile v. State Division of Human Rights, 50 A.D.2d 875, 377 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated May 16, 1975, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, made after an investigation, dismissing petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment because of sex. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs. Upon the evidence adduced in this proceeding, there was no proof of discrimination. The oral motion to quash the subpoena is dismissed. In view of the determination made herein, that motion is moot. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated May 16, 1975, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, made after an investigation, dismissing petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment because of sex. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs. Upon the evidence adduced in this proceeding, there was no proof of discrimination. The oral motion to quash the subpoena is dismissed. In view of the determination made herein, that motion is moot. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 875, 377 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rasile-v-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1975.