Rashun Deonta Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 2020·No. 06-19-00192-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00192-CR

RASHUN DEONTA WILLIAMS, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Red River County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR02883

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

ORDER

Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record includes a social security number. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: January 28, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rashun Deonta Williams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Rashun Deonta Williams v. State (Rashun Deonta Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.