Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow

Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow

502 So. 2d 1013, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 612, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1865
StatusPublished

This text of 502 So. 2d 1013 (Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow, 502 So. 2d 1013, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 612, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed upon this record that appellant, Abdul Rashid, did not receive any notice of the bank’s motion for default as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b). The failure to give such notice requires summary reversal. See J.A.R., Inc. v. Universal Am. Realty Corp., 485 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and cases cited therein.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jar, Inc. v. Universal American Realty
485 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 So. 2d 1013, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 612, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rashid-v-state-bank-trust-co-of-golden-meadow-fladistctapp-1987.