Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow

502 So. 2d 1013, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 612, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 1987·No. No. 86-1865·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed upon this record that appellant, Abdul Rashid, did not receive any notice of the bank’s motion for default as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b). The failure to give such notice requires summary reversal. See J.A.R., Inc. v. Universal Am. Realty Corp., 485 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and cases cited therein.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow, 502 So. 2d 1013, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 612, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

502 So. 2d 1013 (Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jar, Inc. v. Universal American Realty
485 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)