Rasheed Ahmad v. The City of New York, et al.

S.D. New York

Rasheed Ahmad v. The City of New York, et al.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 4, 2026·No. 1:25-cv-04251·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RASHEED AHMAD, Plaintiff, -against- Case No. 1:25-cv-04251 (JLR) THE CITY OF NEW YORK, etal., ORDER OF SERVICE Defendants.

JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: On February 3, 2026, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to docket Plaintiff Rasheed Ahmad’s (“Plaintiff’?) Amended Complaint. Dkt. 22. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint was docketed at Dkt. 23. In his Amended Complaint, Plaintiff names one new defendant, Katherin Martinez. Jd. The City provided the following address for Defendant Martinez: New York City Police Department, 4111 Laconia Avenue, Bronx, New York, 10466. See Dkt. 13. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue an Amended Summons as to Defendant Martinez, and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to complete the USM-285 forms with the address for Defendant Martinez, see Dkt. 13, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. If the Amended Complaint is not served within 90 days after the date summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff's responsibility to request an extension of time for service). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Dated: February 4, 2026 New York, New York SO ORDERED. we L. ROCHON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RASHEED AHMAD, Plaintiff, -against- Case No. 1:25-cv-04251 (JLR) THE CITY OF NEW YORK, etal., ORDER OF SERVICE Defendants.

JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: On February 3, 2026, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to docket Plaintiff Rasheed Ahmad’s (“Plaintiff’?) Amended Complaint. Dkt. 22. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint was docketed at Dkt. 23. In his Amended Complaint, Plaintiff names one new defendant, Katherin Martinez. Jd. The City provided the following address for Defendant Martinez: New York City Police Department, 4111 Laconia Avenue, Bronx, New York, 10466. See Dkt. 13. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue an Amended Summons as to Defendant Martinez, and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to complete the USM-285 forms with the address for Defendant Martinez, see Dkt. 13, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. If the Amended Complaint is not served within 90 days after the date summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff's responsibility to request an extension of time for service). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Dated: February 4, 2026 New York, New York SO ORDERED. we L. ROCHON United States District Judge

Rasheed Ahmad v. The City of New York, et al., (S.D.N.Y. 2026).

Pincite

Rasheed Ahmad v. The City of New York, et al. (Rasheed Ahmad v. The City of New York, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related