Rashe'd v. Dillman

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 2009
Docket08-7129
StatusUnpublished

This text of Rashe'd v. Dillman (Rashe'd v. Dillman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rashe'd v. Dillman, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7129

LATIF RASHE’D,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden Senior; K.L. PICKEREL, Assistant Warden; J.M. MILLNER, Department of Correctional Education,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00333-jct-mfu)

Submitted: February 17, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latif Rashe’d, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Latif Rashe’d appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Rashe’d v. Dillman, No. 7:08-cv-00333-

jct-mfu (W.D. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rashe'd v. Dillman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rashed-v-dillman-ca4-2009.