Rashe'd v. Dillman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2009·No. 08-7129·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7129

LATIF RASHE’D, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden Senior; K.L. PICKEREL, Assistant Warden; J.M. MILLNER, Department of Correctional Education,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00333-jct-mfu)

Submitted: February 17, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latif Rashe’d, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Latif Rashe’d appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rashe’d v. Dillman, No. 7:08-cv-00333- jct-mfu (W.D. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rashe'd v. Dillman, (4th Cir. 2009).

Rashe'd v. Dillman (Rashe'd v. Dillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)