Rashari Nae Fonne Brent v. the State of Texas
This text of Rashari Nae Fonne Brent v. the State of Texas (Rashari Nae Fonne Brent v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00352-CR
RASHARI NAE FONNE BRENT, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 426th District Court Bell County, Texas1 Trial Court No. 80164, Honorable Steven J. Duskie, Presiding
January 9, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Rashari Nae Fonne Brent, appeals his conviction for murder2 and
sentence to fifty-two years of confinement. The reporter’s record was originally due
October 24, 2023, but we granted the reporter an extension to November 27 to file the
record. On November 27, 2023, the reporter filed only seven of nine volumes of the
1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the
Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b)(3). reporter’s record. By letter of December 4, 2023, we notified the reporter that the
complete reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to advise this Court of the status
of the record by December 14. The reporter has not filed the complete record or had any
further communication with this Court to date.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly
responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring
appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to
preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,
the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
(2) why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;
(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those
tasks; and
(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court
finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days
to complete, certify, and file the complete reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute
reporter to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address
the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by February
8, 2024.
2 Should the reporter file the complete reporter’s record on or before January 23,
2024, she is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon
the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rashari Nae Fonne Brent v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rashari-nae-fonne-brent-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.