Raser Technologies, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC
771 S.E.2d 517, 331 Ga. App. 838, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 240
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 30, 2015·No. A14A2084, A14A2085·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
In these cases, the following circumstances exist and are dispositive of the appeals:
(1) The evidence supports the judgments;
(2) The judgments of the court below adequately explain the decisions; and
(3) The issues are controlled adversely to the appellants for the reasons and authority given in the appellees’ briefs.
The judgments of the court below therefore are affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raser Technologies, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC, 771 S.E.2d 517, 331 Ga. App. 838, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 240 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).
771 S.E.2d 517 (Raser Technologies, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raser Technologies v. Merrill Lynch
2022 UT App 20 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2022)
Persinger v. Step by Step Infant Development Center
560 S.E.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)