Raser Technologies, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.
This text of Raser Technologies, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. (Raser Technologies, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DIVISION PHIPPS, C. J., ELLINGTON, P. J., and MCMILLIAN, J.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
March 30, 2015
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia
A14A2084, A14A2085. RASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al. v. MORGAN STANLEY & COMPANY, LLC et al.; and vice versa.
PHIPPS, Chief Judge.
In these cases, the following circumstances exist and are dispositive of the
appeals:
(1) The evidence supports the judgments;
(2) The judgments of the court below adequately explain the decisions; and
(3) The issues are controlled adversely to the appellants for the reasons and
authority given in the appellees’ briefs.
The judgments of the court below therefore are affirmed in accordance with
Court of Appeals Rule 36.
Judgments affirmed in both cases. Ellington, P. J., concurs. McMillian, J.,
concurs in judgment only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raser Technologies, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raser-technologies-inc-v-morgan-stanley-co-inc-gactapp-2015.