Rarrick v. McMillan
This text of 181 A.D. 966 (Rarrick v. McMillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that while there was ample evidence to justify the verdict upon the ground of contributory negligence, we are unable to say with certainty that the jury based their verdict upon that ground, and as the court erred in receiving the declarations of the deceased that he was not married to the mother of the plaintiff, and his declarations concerning his association with and conduct toward other women, we think that a new trial should be granted. All concurred, except Merrell, J., who dissented and voted for affirmance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 A.D. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rarrick-v-mcmillan-nyappdiv-1917.