Home/New York Court of Appeals/Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen

Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen

152 N.E. 440, 242 N.Y. 590, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1129
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 4, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 152 N.E. 440 (Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen, 152 N.E. 440, 242 N.Y. 590, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1129 (N.Y. 1926).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the exclusion of the certificate of Dr. DeGroat as an admission of plaintiff was not prejudicial, and the exclusion of .the evidence and record of Miss Nelson was proper as it appears that she was acting as the agent of the attending physician.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Andrews, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mirque
195 Misc. 2d 375 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2003)
Desai v. Blue Shield of Northeastern New York, Inc.
146 A.D.2d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Weis v. Weis
72 N.E.2d 245 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 N.E. 440, 242 N.Y. 590, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rarogiewicz-v-brotherhood-of-american-yeomen-ny-1926.