Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen
152 N.E. 440, 242 N.Y. 590, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1129
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the exclusion of the certificate of Dr. DeGroat as an admission of plaintiff was not prejudicial, and the exclusion of .the evidence and record of Miss Nelson was proper as it appears that she was acting as the agent of the attending physician.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Andrews, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen, 152 N.E. 440, 242 N.Y. 590, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1129 (N.Y. 1926).
152 N.E. 440 (Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Mirque
195 Misc. 2d 375 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2003)
Desai v. Blue Shield of Northeastern New York, Inc.
146 A.D.2d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Weis v. Weis
72 N.E.2d 245 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1947)