Raquet v. Zane
95 N.Y.2d 779
This text of 95 N.Y.2d 779 (Raquet v. Zane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Raquet v. Zane, 95 N.Y.2d 779 (N.Y. 2000).
Opinion
Motion by Olivieri for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion by Carol J. Braun et al. for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (CPLR 5513 [b]; 2103 [b] [2]). Said movants are not adverse parties within the meaning of CPLR 5513 (c).
Judge Wesley taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raquet-v-zane-ny-2000.