Raqiyb v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Raqiyb v. Goord

297 A.D.2d 847, 746 N.Y.2d 852, 746 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8305

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 12, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 847 (Raqiyb v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raqiyb v. Goord, 297 A.D.2d 847, 746 N.Y.2d 852, 746 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner was the subject of two prison disciplinary hearings, held July 3, 2001, that ultimately resulted in two determinations finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. As both determinations have been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s institutional records, petitioner has now received all the relief [848]*848to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved (see Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912). Hence, Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing the petition as moot is affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner was the subject of two prison disciplinary hearings, held July 3, 2001, that ultimately resulted in two determinations finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. As both determinations have been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s institutional records, petitioner has now received all the relief [848]*848to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved (see Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912). Hence, Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing the petition as moot is affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 A.D.2d 847, 746 N.Y.2d 852, 746 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raqiyb-v-goord-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack