Raqiyb v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Raqiyb v. Goord

297 A.D.2d 847, 746 N.Y.2d 852, 746 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8305

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 12, 2002·Published

Opinion

Petitioner was the subject of two prison disciplinary hearings, held July 3, 2001, that ultimately resulted in two determinations finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. As both determinations have been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s institutional records, petitioner has now received all the relief [848] to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved (see Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912). Hence, Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing the petition as moot is affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner was the subject of two prison disciplinary hearings, held July 3, 2001, that ultimately resulted in two determinations finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. As both determinations have been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s institutional records, petitioner has now received all the relief [848] to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved (see Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912). Hence, Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing the petition as moot is affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Raqiyb v. Goord, 297 A.D.2d 847, 746 N.Y.2d 852, 746 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

297 A.D.2d 847 (Raqiyb v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related