Rappich v. Altermatt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Rappich v. Altermatt

161 N.E.2d 649, 81 Ohio Law. Abs. 363, 1956 Ohio App. LEXIS 812

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 17, 1956

DocketNo. 5451

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 N.E.2d 649 (Rappich v. Altermatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rappich v. Altermatt, 161 N.E.2d 649, 81 Ohio Law. Abs. 363, 1956 Ohio App. LEXIS 812 (Ohio Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

By TPIE COURT.

The parties have briefed the claimed errors which appellants seek to have reviewed in this court on appeal. Upon an examination of the [364]*364final entry in the trial court we find that it recites only that the demurrer to the petition is well taken and is sustained.

Unfortunately for appellants the sustaining of the demurrer is not a final order and this court ,would not be justified in discussing and deciding the errors sought to be raised.

Appeals may be prosecuted only from final orders or judgments. Sec. 2505.02 R. C.; Davis v. Moor, 54 Abs 383.

The appeal will be dismissed and cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings according to law.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI