Rappe Ex Rel. Rappe v. Carr

167 S.E.2d 48, 4 N.C. App. 497, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1530
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided April 30, 1969·No. 6927DC226·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Campbell, J.

This appeal challenges only the ruling of Judge Bulwinkle in sustaining Town’s demurrers to each complaint. In passing upon the *499 demurrers, the facts alleged in the complaint and relevant inferences of fact necessarily deducible therefrom will be taken as true.

When exercising their police power or their judicial, discretionary or legislative authority as conferred by charters and statutes or when discharging a duty imposed solely for the public benefit, municipal corporations are not liable for the tortious acts of their officers and agents. While municipalities are not required to install electrical traffic control signals, they may do so as an exercise of their police power. G.S. 160-200(11) and (31). The installation and maintenance of such signals in and by municipalities are governmental functions and not proprietary or corporate functions. Hamilton v. Hamlet, 238 N.C. 741, 78 S.E. 2d 770. Therefore, the judgment sustaining Town’s demurrers is

Affirmed.

BhoCK and MoRris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rappe Ex Rel. Rappe v. Carr, 167 S.E.2d 48, 4 N.C. App. 497, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1530 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

167 S.E.2d 48 (Rappe Ex Rel. Rappe v. Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cucina v. City of Jacksonville
530 S.E.2d 353 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Lonon v. Talbert
407 S.E.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
Talian v. City of Charlotte
390 S.E.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)