Rapp v. Schmidt
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 16-OCT-2025 07:57 AM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 20 ORD
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
JOHN RAPP, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
THOMAS F. SCHMIDT, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant
and
LORINNA J. SCHMIDT, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC940000903)
ORDER (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ., and Circuit Judge Drewyer, assigned by reason of vacancy)
The record reflects that Petitioner/Defendant- Appellant Thomas F. Schmidt (Schmidt) has filed two Applications for Writ of Certiorari in this matter. The first application was filed on October 14, 2025, before the Intermediate Court of Appeals had filed a judgment on appeal. See Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (2017) and Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (eff. 2016). Schmidt’s second application was filed on October 15, 2025, after the Intermediate Court of Appeals filed its Judgment on Appeal earlier on the same date. Therefore, it is ordered that: A. Petitioner Schmidt’s first application for writ of certiorari, filed on October 14, 2025, is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of his second application. See HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (eff. 2023) (“The application shall be filed within 30 days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”); B. Petitioner Schmidt’s second application for writ of certiorari, timely filed on October 15, 2025, is the operative application in this matter; and C. The time for filing a response under HRAP Rule 40.1(e) shall be calculated from the second application for writ of certiorari filed on October 15, 2025. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, October 16, 2025. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens /s/ Michelle L. Drewyer
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rapp v. Schmidt (Rapp v. Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.