Rapp v. Briarcliff Contemporaries, Inc.

619 N.E.2d 649, 82 N.Y.2d 683, 601 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2256
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 6, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 619 N.E.2d 649 (Rapp v. Briarcliff Contemporaries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rapp v. Briarcliff Contemporaries, Inc., 619 N.E.2d 649, 82 N.Y.2d 683, 601 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2256 (N.Y. 1993).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying plaintiffs’ cross motion to vacate the stipulation of settlement, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion to enlarge the record denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 N.E.2d 649, 82 N.Y.2d 683, 601 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapp-v-briarcliff-contemporaries-inc-ny-1993.