Rapp ex rel. Seybert v. Elliot

1 Yeates 185
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Sed per Cur.

You are now too late; the affidavits should have been filed when you pleaded the dilatory plea. This we take to be the spirit and true intent of the rule, and apprehend to be the practice in England under the stat. 4 and 5 Ann. c. 16, § 11, from which the rule is taken. Vide 3 Burr. 1617. 1 Barnes 257.

Rule made absolute, to set aside the plea, for want of an affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rapp ex rel. Seybert v. Elliot, 1 Yeates 185 (Pa. 1792).

1 Yeates 185 (Rapp ex rel. Seybert v. Elliot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caulk v. Everly
6 Whart. 303 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1841)