Rapozo v. State
This text of Rapozo v. State (Rapozo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
maris i.§:;“sm;qy
NO. 30604
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAlj¥ “¢
."“z
RlCHARD B. RAPOZO, Petitioner,
VS.
€i§~§§“'l@r:£
STATE OF HAWAl‘I, Respondent.
ORlGlNAL PROCEEDING
(By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, A§§§§¥:Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Richard B. Rapozo and the papers in support, it appears that habeas corpus relief is available to petitioner in the circuit court and petitioner presents no special reason for invoking the supreme court's original jurisdiction. See Oili v. Chanq, 57 Haw. 5ll, 5l2, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (l976). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of habeas corpus without payment of the filing fee.
lT lS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to seeking relief in the circuit court.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawafi, July l5, 2010.
WM
15¢¢.¢4.//¢ ¢J.S*\@ww»¢{cu)m
/W‘~"W q%mL€~QqQHQq»
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rapozo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapozo-v-state-haw-2010.