Raposo v. Environmental Protection Board

Connecticut Appellate Court

Raposo v. Environmental Protection Board

591 A.2d 833, 24 Conn. App. 841, 1991 Conn. App. LEXIS 181

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJune 4, 1991

Docket9437

StatusPublished

This text of 591 A.2d 833 (Raposo v. Environmental Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raposo v. Environmental Protection Board, 591 A.2d 833, 24 Conn. App. 841, 1991 Conn. App. LEXIS 181 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The issues raised in this case are (1) whether the trial court properly upheld the decision of the defendant board¹ after the board had decided contrary to the recommendation of its staff, (2) whether the defendant board’s denial of the plaintiff’s application amounted to an unconstitutional exercise of the state’s police power, and (3) whether the defendant board’s decision amounted to an unconstitutional taking of the plaintiff’s property. These same issues were raised and thoroughly discussed in our recent resolution of Laufer v. Conservation Commission, 24 Conn. App. 708, 592 A.2d 392 (1991). In light of our decision in Laufer, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in the present case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The issues raised in this case are (1) whether the trial court properly upheld the decision of the defendant board¹ after the board had decided contrary to the recommendation of its staff, (2) whether the defendant board’s denial of the plaintiff’s application amounted to an unconstitutional exercise of the state’s police power, and (3) whether the defendant board’s decision amounted to an unconstitutional taking of the plaintiff’s property. These same issues were raised and thoroughly discussed in our recent resolution of Laufer v. Conservation Commission, 24 Conn. App. 708, 592 A.2d 392 (1991). In light of our decision in Laufer, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in the present case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 A.2d 833, 24 Conn. App. 841, 1991 Conn. App. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raposo-v-environmental-protection-board-connappct-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack