Rapoport v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rapoport v. McGoldrick

285 A.D. 815, 136 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 815 (Rapoport v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rapoport v. McGoldrick, 285 A.D. 815, 136 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the respondent [State Rent Administrator] reversing an order of a local rent administrator which granted petitioner’s application for a certificate of eviction against a tenant of a one-family house owned by petitioner and his sister. Petitioner appeals from .an order denying his petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. It cannot be said on this record that there was not adequate evidence to support respondent’s finding that the petitioner did not seek the premises for himself. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldock and Murphy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the respondent [State Rent Administrator] reversing an order of a local rent administrator which granted petitioner’s application for a certificate of eviction against a tenant of a one-family house owned by petitioner and his sister. Petitioner appeals from .an order denying his petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. It cannot be said on this record that there was not adequate evidence to support respondent’s finding that the petitioner did not seek the premises for himself. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldock and Murphy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 815, 136 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapoport-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1955.