Rapkiewicz v. Middle Country School District

273 A.D.2d 392, 711 N.Y.S.2d 326, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7087
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 19, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 273 A.D.2d 392 (Rapkiewicz v. Middle Country School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rapkiewicz v. Middle Country School District, 273 A.D.2d 392, 711 N.Y.S.2d 326, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Middle Country School District, dated July 1, 1998, which adopted the finding of a Hearing Officer, made after a hearing, that the petitioner was guilty of misconduct and terminated his employment as a school custodian.

Adjudged that the petition is granted to the extent that the [393]*393penalty is annulled and is otherwise denied, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the respondent for the imposition of an appropriate penalty less severe than termination of the petitioner’s employment

The determination that the petitioner was guilty of misconduct is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Hutnan Rights, 45 NY2d 176). However, under all of the circumstances, the penalty of dismissal was so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). The petitioner had received “outstanding” ratings in his seven-year service with the respondent, and the misconduct, while serious, was an isolated event (see, Matter of Rice v Hilton Cent. School Dist. Bd. of Educ., 258 AD2d 900; Matter of Drakeford v Board of Educ., 242 AD2d 627). The matter is remitted to the respondent for the imposition of a penalty less severe than termination of the petitioner’s employment. O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waldren v. Town of Islip
18 A.D.3d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
McDermott v. Town Board of Patterson
16 A.D.3d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Catena v. Village of Southampton
289 A.D.2d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D.2d 392, 711 N.Y.S.2d 326, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapkiewicz-v-middle-country-school-district-nyappdiv-2000.