Rapier v. Holland
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
If we were to admit that the special replication of the [177] plaintiff was bad, we should be bound to look back to the first Error of the party demurring : there can be no doubt but that the defendants’ plea of set-off was bad, and would have been so held on general demurrer. In an action on a promise made to an administrator, a debt due from his intestate cannot be set off: the demands are in different rights : to set off the last against the first might do injustice to the rights of other creditors, and with our Statutes as to insolvent estates, &c.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 Minor 176 (Rapier v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.