Raphael v. Zehner

42 A. 1015, 56 N.J. Eq. 836, 11 Dickinson 836, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 69
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 15, 1898·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raphael v. Zehner, 42 A. 1015, 56 N.J. Eq. 836, 11 Dickinson 836, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 69 (N.J. 1898).

42 A. 1015 (Raphael v. Zehner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. Jacobs
148 A. 771 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)