Raphael v. Zehner
42 A. 1015, 56 N.J. Eq. 836, 11 Dickinson 836, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 69
This text of 42 A. 1015 (Raphael v. Zehner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Raphael v. Zehner, 42 A. 1015, 56 N.J. Eq. 836, 11 Dickinson 836, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 69 (N.J. 1898).
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. Jacobs
148 A. 771 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 A. 1015, 56 N.J. Eq. 836, 11 Dickinson 836, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raphael-v-zehner-nj-1898.