Raphael v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Raphael v. State

574 So. 2d 329, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1655, 1991 WL 26818

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1229

StatusPublished

This text of 574 So. 2d 329 (Raphael v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raphael v. State, 574 So. 2d 329, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1655, 1991 WL 26818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state correctly concedes that the trial court erred in excluding the defense witnesses without conducting a Richardson inquiry. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971); Smith v. State, 372 So.2d 86 (Fla.1979); S.G. v. State, 518 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Ward v. State, 477 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), approved, 502 So.2d 1245 (Fla.1987). We therefore reverse the convictions and sentences and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state correctly concedes that the trial court erred in excluding the defense witnesses without conducting a Richardson inquiry. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971); Smith v. State, 372 So.2d 86 (Fla.1979); S.G. v. State, 518 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Ward v. State, 477 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), approved, 502 So.2d 1245 (Fla.1987). We therefore reverse the convictions and sentences and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

574 So. 2d 329, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1655, 1991 WL 26818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raphael-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack