Raphael v. State
574 So. 2d 329, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1655, 1991 WL 26818
Opinion
The state correctly concedes that the trial court erred in excluding the defense witnesses without conducting a Richardson inquiry. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971); Smith v. State, 372 So.2d 86 (Fla.1979); S.G. v. State, 518 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Ward v. State, 477 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), approved, 502 So.2d 1245 (Fla.1987). We therefore reverse the convictions and sentences and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raphael v. State, 574 So. 2d 329, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1655, 1991 WL 26818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
574 So. 2d 329 (Raphael v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
372 So. 2d 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Richardson v. State
246 So. 2d 771 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Ward v. State
477 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
S.G. v. State
518 So. 2d 964 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)