Raphael Mendez v. John T. Hadden, Warden

Fourth Circuit

Raphael Mendez v. John T. Hadden, Warden

21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15861, 1994 WL 83775

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 1994

Docket93-7347

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 423 (Raphael Mendez v. John T. Hadden, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raphael Mendez v. John T. Hadden, Warden, 21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15861, 1994 WL 83775 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

21 F.3d 423
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Raphael MENDEZ, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
John T. HADDEN, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-7347.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided: March 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-380-HC-F).

Raphael Mendez, appellant pro se.

Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mendez v. Hadden, No. CA-93-380-HC-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21 F.3d 423
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Raphael MENDEZ, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
John T. HADDEN, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-7347.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided: March 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-380-HC-F).

Raphael Mendez, appellant pro se.

Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mendez v. Hadden, No. CA-93-380-HC-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15861, 1994 WL 83775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raphael-mendez-v-john-t-hadden-warden-ca4-1994.