Raphael Mendez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

402 F. App'x 148
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2010
Docket10-2806
StatusUnpublished

This text of 402 F. App'x 148 (Raphael Mendez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raphael Mendez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 402 F. App'x 148 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raphael Mendez, an involuntarily committed federal detainee who is confined at the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota, appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon careful review, we conclude that Mendez is not entitled to habeas relief for the reasons relied upon by the district court. See Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). We also find Mendez’s allegations of judicial bias to be meritless. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, Chief United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liteky v. United States
510 U.S. 540 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Mitchell v. United States Parole Commission
538 F.3d 948 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 F. App'x 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raphael-mendez-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-ca8-2010.