Raphael Charistil v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 2025·No. 4D2025-0969·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

RAPHAEL CHARISTIL, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-0969

[August 20, 2025]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-5699CF10A.

Raphael Charistil, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, No. SC2025-0708, 2025 WL 1561151 (Fla. June 3, 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided); see also Chapa v. State, 159 So. 3d 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

KUNTZ, C.J., LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raphael Charistil v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Raphael Charistil v. State of Florida (Raphael Charistil v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erlinger v. United States
602 U.S. 821 (Supreme Court, 2024)