Raphael Charistil v. State of Florida
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
RAPHAEL CHARISTIL, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0969
[August 20, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-5699CF10A.
Raphael Charistil, Wewahitchka, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, No. SC2025-0708, 2025 WL 1561151 (Fla. June 3, 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided); see also Chapa v. State, 159 So. 3d 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).
KUNTZ, C.J., LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raphael Charistil v. State of Florida (Raphael Charistil v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.