Rapelye v. Coupe
This text of 167 A.D. 956 (Rapelye v. Coupe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Lambert, J., who dissented upon the grounds: 1. That there is no proof in the case supporting or tending to support the “ sixth,” “seventh” and “eighth” findings of fact. 2. That the conclusions of law numbered consecutively and inclusive of findings “first” to “eighth” are without warrant of law and ineffectual to sustain the judgment here in review. 3. That the judgment is contrary to law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.D. 956, 152 N.Y.S. 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapelye-v-coupe-nyappdiv-1915.