Rape v. State

286 S.W. 1090, 1926 Tex. App. LEXIS 1155
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 1926·No. No. 10171·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for possession of equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Punishment is assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither bills of exception nor statement of facts. We observe, however, that the judgment as entered condemned appellant to be guilty of the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. The sentence, however, recites that he was convicted of the [1091]*1091possession of equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. The only issue submitted to the jury was as to whether appellant possessed equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and the verdict of the jury was responsive upon that issue.

The judgment will be reformed, condemning appellant to be guilty of possession of equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, and, as thus reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rape v. State, 286 S.W. 1090, 1926 Tex. App. LEXIS 1155 (Tex. 1926).

286 S.W. 1090 (Rape v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
67 S.W.2d 283 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Harris v. State
53 S.W.2d 48 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)