Rape Appeal

242 A.2d 222, 430 Pa. 87, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 673
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 21, 1968·No. Appeal, 88·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appellant-petitioner took an appeal from the order of the lower Court involving an election contest. This was error. The proper procedure was to file a petition for certiorari under Supreme Court Rule 68% within thirty days from the date of the order sought to be reviewed. No petition was filed within the thirty-day time limit. Thereafter, a petition was filed by the petitioner-appellant, Harold H. Rape, for allowance of an appeal nunc pro tunc under Rule 68%. We find no merit in this petition.

Petition denied and appeal quashed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rape Appeal, 242 A.2d 222, 430 Pa. 87, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 673 (Pa. 1968).

242 A.2d 222 (Rape Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coston v. Upper Merion Township
255 A.2d 565 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Norristown School District v. Glover
243 A.2d 348 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)