Rapaport v. Clark
This text of 285 A.D. 1017 (Rapaport v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga Trial Term for plaintiff against all defendants in an automobile negligence action. Defendants Bertrand appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. Also appeal by the third-party defendant Reuben Rapaport from a judgment of the same court in favor of the third-party plaintiff Clark against the third-party defendant for the amount of plaintiff’s recovery.) Present — Vaughan, J. P., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 1017, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapaport-v-clark-nyappdiv-1955.