Rao v. McAuliffe
124 Misc. 331, 208 N.Y.S. 42, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 641
This text of 124 Misc. 331 (Rao v. McAuliffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rao v. McAuliffe, 124 Misc. 331, 208 N.Y.S. 42, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
There is no requirement in law that parties seeking increased rental must be the owners of the fee involved for any fixed period of time.
The judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with ten dollars costs to the appellants to abide the final award of costs.
All concur; present, Guy, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
124 Misc. 331, 208 N.Y.S. 42, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rao-v-mcauliffe-nyappterm-1925.