Ranspach v. Teutonia Fire Insurance
This text of 67 N.W. 967 (Ranspach v. Teutonia Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts). We think the court should have directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff accepted the policy subject to all its terms and conditions. He knew, or must be held to have known, that the policy would be void if the house remained vacant beyond 10 days. Even if the agent had been told that the house was vacant at the time of the assignment, this did not make a new contract to keep the property insured beyond the 10 days of vacancy. The proposition is too plain to require further argument or citation of authorities.
Judgment reversed, and no new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 N.W. 967, 109 Mich. 699, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranspach-v-teutonia-fire-insurance-mich-1896.