Ranson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ranson v. State

721 So. 2d 372, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13662, 1998 WL 746043

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 28, 1998

DocketNo. 98-03859

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 721 So. 2d 372 (Ranson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ranson v. State, 721 So. 2d 372, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13662, 1998 WL 746043 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Gerry Ranson, filed six previous petitions for writs in this court in 1998, all of which were denied. In addition, petitioner has filed numerous appeals to this court. His appeal from criminal convictions is pending with counsel appointed (Case No. 98-01396). Many other appeals filed by appellant, pro se, have been dismissed, some for jurisdictional reasons and some voluntarily.

The instant petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus is frivolous and states no basis for relief. Accordingly, we find that petitioner has abused the process of this court. We direct the clerk of this court to reject for filing all petitions for extraordinary relief sent by or on behalf of Mr. Ranson unless submitted and signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Any such papers filed in violation of this order will be automatically placed in an inactive file. See Day v. Vinson, 713 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Bivens v. State, 715 So.2d 261 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Petition denied.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and SALCINES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Gerry Ranson, filed six previous petitions for writs in this court in 1998, all of which were denied. In addition, petitioner has filed numerous appeals to this court. His appeal from criminal convictions is pending with counsel appointed (Case No. 98-01396). Many other appeals filed by appellant, pro se, have been dismissed, some for jurisdictional reasons and some voluntarily.

The instant petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus is frivolous and states no basis for relief. Accordingly, we find that petitioner has abused the process of this court. We direct the clerk of this court to reject for filing all petitions for extraordinary relief sent by or on behalf of Mr. Ranson unless submitted and signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Any such papers filed in violation of this order will be automatically placed in an inactive file. See Day v. Vinson, 713 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Bivens v. State, 715 So.2d 261 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Petition denied.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and SALCINES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

721 So. 2d 372, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13662, 1998 WL 746043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranson-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack