Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Beggs

196 P. 488, 185 Cal. 799, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 603
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Beggs. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 Cal. 279
California Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1921·No. S. F. No. 9739.·Published

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment. The facts are the same as in Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Beggs et al., ante, p. 279, [196 P. 487].

The appeal is dismissed.

Angellotti, C. J., Shaw, J., Wilbur, J., Sloane, J., Olney, J., Lennon, J., and Lawlor, J., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

All the Justices concurred, except Sloane, J., who was absent.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Beggs, 196 P. 488, 185 Cal. 799, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 603 (Cal. 1921).

196 P. 488 (Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Beggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Beggs
196 P. 487 (California Supreme Court, 1921)