Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ransom v. State

Ransom v. State

894 So. 2d 974, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13638, 2004 WL 2047549
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 15, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-2913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 894 So. 2d 974 (Ransom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ransom v. State, 894 So. 2d 974, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13638, 2004 WL 2047549 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that Eric D. Ransom’s request that he be granted a belated appeal of his January 2001 judgment and sentence is barred as untimely by operation of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4)(A). Although Ransom’s request for a belated appeal of the September 2002 order denying his motion for postconviction relief was timely made, he has failed to allege an adequate factual basis for granting the relief he seeks. Accordingly, the amended petition seeking belated appeal is denied.

KAHN, WEBSTER and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linn v. Fossum
894 So. 2d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 So. 2d 974, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13638, 2004 WL 2047549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ransom-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.