Ransom v. Locklear

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Ransom v. Locklear

98 S.E.2d 348, 246 N.C. 456, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 434

DecidedJune 7, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E.2d 348 (Ransom v. Locklear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ransom v. Locklear, 98 S.E.2d 348, 246 N.C. 456, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 434 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole assignment of error on this appeal, other than formal ones, is directed to denial of defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. Taking the evidence offered upon the trial below in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as is done in considering demurrer to the evidence, the case was one for the jury, and properly submitted to the jury. The jury has spoken. Hence in judgment signed there is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The sole assignment of error on this appeal, other than formal ones, is directed to denial of defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. Taking the evidence offered upon the trial below in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as is done in considering demurrer to the evidence, the case was one for the jury, and properly submitted to the jury. The jury has spoken. Hence in judgment signed there is

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 S.E.2d 348, 246 N.C. 456, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ransom-v-locklear-nc-1957.