Ransom v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ransom v. Fuller

134 Ala. 663

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1902·Published

Opinion

This was a statutory trial of the right- of property. The appellant, W. T. Bansom, commenced a suit by attachment against one J. L. Cook. To the property- levied upon under the writ of attachment, the appellee, Luther Fuller, interposed- a claim as provided for by statute. •In the trial of the claim suit judgment was rendered for the claimant, from which judgment the plaintiff prosecuted the present appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was a statutory trial of the right- of property. The appellant, W. T. Bansom, commenced a suit by attachment against one J. L. Cook. To the property- levied upon under the writ of attachment, the appellee, Luther Fuller, interposed- a claim as provided for by statute. •In the trial of the claim suit judgment was rendered for the claimant, from which judgment the plaintiff prosecuted the present appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.

Ransom v. Fuller, 134 Ala. 663 (Ala. 1902).

Pincite

134 Ala. 663 (Ransom v. Fuller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.