Ransbury v. Eisenman
528 So. 2d 1378, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1880, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3581, 1988 WL 81919
This text of 528 So. 2d 1378 (Ransbury v. Eisenman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ransbury v. Eisenman, 528 So. 2d 1378, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1880, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3581, 1988 WL 81919 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
We reverse the final summary judgment because we believe there are issues of fact that should be resolved upon trial concerning the provisions of the real estate sales contract dealing with the disposition of the deposit if the transaction is not consummated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 1378, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1880, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3581, 1988 WL 81919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ransbury-v-eisenman-fladistctapp-1988.