Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. John Sedlacsik, Jr., and Interplanetary Research & Development Corp
This text of 397 F.2d 804 (Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. John Sedlacsik, Jr., and Interplanetary Research & Development Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
In this civil action brought pursuant to the provisions of 35 U.S.C.A. § 146 for determination of priority of invention, the District Court, to which trial was had, affirmed the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences on its finding that the plaintiff failed to discharge its burden of proof to establish “a thorough conviction that a mistake had been made” by the Board. Morgan v. Daniels, 153 U.S. 120, 14 S.Ct. 772, 38 L.Ed. 657 (1894); Radio Corporation of America v. International Standard Electric Corporation, 232 F.2d 726 (3 Cir. 1956).
On review of the record we cannot say that the District Court’s finding was “clearly erroneous” under Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., and accordingly the Order of the District Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 F.2d 804, 158 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 437, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ransburg-electro-coating-corp-v-john-sedlacsik-jr-and-interplanetary-ca3-1968.