Ranolde v. Mulgrew
This text of 212 A.D.2d 766 (Ranolde v. Mulgrew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated September 14, 1993, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
[767]*767Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On the record before us, there is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 A.D.2d 766, 624 N.Y.S.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranolde-v-mulgrew-nyappdiv-1995.