Ranni v. Berger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ranni v. Berger

52 A.D.2d 607, 382 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12225

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 607 (Ranni v. Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ranni v. Berger, 52 A.D.2d 607, 382 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia (1) to review appellants’ determination to terminate petitioner’s services as a hearing officer and (2) to compel his reinstatement, the appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated October 15, 1975, as, upon ordering petitioner’s reinstatement, directed appellants to grant him retroactive compensation and benefits from the date of termination of his employment. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner’s dismissal was contrary to law (see Civil Service Law, § 75; 4 NYCRR 4.5 [a] [3]). Petitioner, having been directed to be restored to his position by order of Special Term, is entitled to retroactive compensation and benefits from the date of his dismissal (see Civil Service Law, § 77). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia (1) to review appellants’ determination to terminate petitioner’s services as a hearing officer and (2) to compel his reinstatement, the appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated October 15, 1975, as, upon ordering petitioner’s reinstatement, directed appellants to grant him retroactive compensation and benefits from the date of termination of his employment. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner’s dismissal was contrary to law (see Civil Service Law, § 75; 4 NYCRR 4.5 [a] [3]). Petitioner, having been directed to be restored to his position by order of Special Term, is entitled to retroactive compensation and benefits from the date of his dismissal (see Civil Service Law, § 77). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 607, 382 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranni-v-berger-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack