Ranney v. Munro

446 A.2d 381, 141 Vt. 655, 1982 Vt. LEXIS 487
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedMarch 25, 1982
DocketNo. 51-81
StatusPublished

This text of 446 A.2d 381 (Ranney v. Munro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ranney v. Munro, 446 A.2d 381, 141 Vt. 655, 1982 Vt. LEXIS 487 (Vt. 1982).

Opinion

Summary judgment affirmed. This Court, in Ranney v. Munro, 138 Vt. 523, 418 A.2d 862 (1980), affirmed the previous order of the trial court dated November 26, 1980, which granted defendant’s V.R.C.P. 12(b) (6) motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim. Accordingly, the doctrine of res adjudicata bars this action. V.R.C.P. 41(b) (3); Cody v. Estate of Cody, 134 Vt. 113, 114, 352 A.2d 684, 685 (1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cody v. Estate of Cody
352 A.2d 684 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1976)
Ranney v. Munro
418 A.2d 862 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 A.2d 381, 141 Vt. 655, 1982 Vt. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranney-v-munro-vt-1982.