Rankins v. Rankins

1928 OK 568, 270 P. 561, 132 Okla. 298, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 775
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 25, 1928·No. 18578·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

HUNT, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county vacating and setting aside a judgment theretofore rendered in said cause. Since the filing- of the petition in error and case-mad'e in this court, the defendant in error has filed herein her confession of error and request for reversal.

In the case of National Fire Ins. Co. v. Hammon Trading Co., 46 Okla. 233, 148 Pac. 722, this court laid down the rule that:

“Where, upon appeal, defendant in error confesses error, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed, and tlie case remanded.”

The judgment and order of the trial court vacating and setting aside the judgment previously rendered is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

MASON, V. C. J., and HARRISON, PHELPS, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rankins v. Rankins, 1928 OK 568, 270 P. 561, 132 Okla. 298, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 775 (Okla. 1928).

1928 OK 568 (Rankins v. Rankins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Depuy v. Hoeme
1989 OK 42 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1989)
Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.
732 P.2d 438 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1986)
Adams v. Unterkircher
714 P.2d 193 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1986)
Raper v. Evans
1935 OK 1114 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)