Rankins v. Currie

Fourth Circuit

Rankins v. Currie

104 F. App'x 320

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2004·No. No. 04-6441·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Rankins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rankins v. Currie, No. CA-02-784-5-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Rankins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rankins v. Currie, No. CA-02-784-5-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Rankins v. Currie, 104 F. App'x 320 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

104 F. App'x 320 (Rankins v. Currie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related