Rankine v. AMR Corp.

176 So. 3d 392, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15643, 2015 WL 6390933
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 2015·No. No. 1D15-2892·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIÁM.

Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981).

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rankine v. AMR Corp., 176 So. 3d 392, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15643, 2015 WL 6390933 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

176 So. 3d 392 (Rankine v. AMR Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company
192 So. 3d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)