Rankin v. State

197 So. 2d 545
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1967
DocketNo. 7320
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 So. 2d 545 (Rankin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rankin v. State, 197 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under authority of Murray v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 487; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 243; Carey v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 603; Cole v. State. Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 698; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 34; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 675; Johnson v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 667, and Ogilvie v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 710.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barfield v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company
197 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 So. 2d 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rankin-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.