Rankin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rankin v. State

197 So. 2d 545

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1967·No. No. 7320·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under authority of Murray v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 487; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 243; Carey v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 603; Cole v. State. Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 698; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 34; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 675; Johnson v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 667, and Ogilvie v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 710.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under authority of Murray v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 487; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 243; Carey v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 603; Cole v. State. Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 698; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 34; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 675; Johnson v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 667, and Ogilvie v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 710.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ-, concur.

Rankin v. State, 197 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

197 So. 2d 545 (Rankin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related