Rankin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Rankin v. State

216 S.W.3d 130, 364 Ark. 58

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 27, 2005

DocketCR 04-1188

StatusPublished

This text of 216 S.W.3d 130 (Rankin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rankin v. State, 216 S.W.3d 130, 364 Ark. 58 (Ark. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Roderick Leshun Rankin appeals the July 13, 2004 order of the Jefferson County Circuit Court, whereby he was denied any relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.5 (2005). However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the addendum. Likewise, the petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 37.5, and any amendments thereto, are not included in the addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the addendum is insufficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended addendum. Dodson v. State, 357 Ark. 646, 187 S.W.3d 854 (2004). Under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court may affirm the judgment if an amended addendum is not filed within the fifteen days)

Dickey, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Roderick Leshun Rankin appeals the July 13, 2004 order of the Jefferson County Circuit Court, whereby he was denied any relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.5 (2005). However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the addendum. Likewise, the petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 37.5, and any amendments thereto, are not included in the addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the addendum is insufficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended addendum. Dodson v. State, 357 Ark. 646, 187 S.W.3d 854 (2004). Under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court may affirm the judgment if an amended addendum is not filed within the fifteen days)

Dickey, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 S.W.3d 130, 364 Ark. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rankin-v-state-ark-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack