Rankin v. State

942 S.W.2d 251, 328 Ark. 146, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 222
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rankin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 329 Ark. 379
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided April 14, 1997·No. CR 96-1025·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The procedural history of this appeal was recited in our per curiam order of March 24, 1997. By that order we granted Roderick Leshun Rankin’s motion to be allowed to file a belated brief. We also ordered his counsel, Gene E. McKissic, to appear to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this Court for failure to file a brief on behalf of Mr. Rankin by February 20, 1997, which we had designated as the date it was due after a third and “final extension.”

Mr. McKissic appeared on April 7, 1997, pleaded guilty in response to the contempt citation, and offered a statement in mitigation concerning his heavy case load as a member of one of two law firms in Jefferson County sharing the work of representing indigent clients pursuant to a contract with the County.

We accept Mr. McKissic’s plea and statement. He is hereby fined $250. A copy of this order will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rankin v. State, 942 S.W.2d 251, 328 Ark. 146, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 222 (Ark. 1997).

942 S.W.2d 251 (Rankin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.