Rankin v. Minister of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church

1 Edw. Ch. 20, 1831 N.Y. LEXIS 340, 1831 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1
New York Court of Chancery·Decided June 13, 1831·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor.

It is not safe to proceed on this pe-

tition. The law suspends the decree in this case until a fur[21]*21thcr default (2 R. S. 192. 193.) But the defendants who now petition are not without their remedy. They may file a sup-i J *> a plemental hill, setting forth the original hill and the decree, and pray for permission to move the latter, and be paid after the first mortgagee is satisfied his amount and costs. Thus, they may connect their 'proceeding with the original bill, without danger from an objection that another suit is pending in relation to the same matter.

Application refused, without costs; but the petitioners have leave to file a supplemental bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rankin v. Minister of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church, 1 Edw. Ch. 20, 1831 N.Y. LEXIS 340, 1831 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1 (N.Y. 1831).

1 Edw. Ch. 20 (Rankin v. Minister of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bache v. Purcell
51 How. Pr. 270 (New York Supreme Court, 1874)